Shop More Submit  Join Login
×

:iconjekkal: More from jekkal


Featured in Collections

Journals de interes by SabriSugar-chan

Writings by CrypticMachine

references by Chibi-Tediz


More from deviantART



Details

Submitted on
April 9, 2007
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
28,548 (7 today)
Favourites
380 (who?)
Comments
476
×
A common topic among the anthro community (and heck, DeviantArt at large) is the classification of what is anthro, what is furry, and what isn't. Heck, even well-established artists have a hard time explaining it, and to quote Scott Kurtz of PvP: "Cartoon animals don't have boobs!"

An often-offered definition of the difference between Anthro and Furry is that Furry is a sexualized form of Anthro, whereas Anthro is simply drawing animals acting like humans and sipping tea; ergo, Anthro is the 'true' art and standard of civilization, while Furry is its mentally retarded drooly cousin, mostly consisting of cub porn and recolored Sonic OC's.

This is the most widely accepted definition between Furry and Anthro. It's also dead wrong.

To help demonstrate this, I've made up a simple graph to make it clear what 'Anthro' is and what Furry isn't:

How to Classify Anthro by jekkal

A brief explanation of the relevant bits so I'm not just repeating what's already written on the chart's deviation page:

Anthro covers every possible thing you could turn into a humanoid.
Anthro Machines are Droids.
Anthro Plants are Treants.
Anthro Animals are Furries.
Anthro anything else is . . . whatever you want to call it, it's not really important which.

In case you didn't notice it when you first saw the chart, the style, the context, and the genre are completely and utterly irrelevant. There is no delineation or special terminology given to obscene materials in that chart, or for cartoon characters, or for realistic representations of these concepts. There's a good reason for that.

If you are drawing ANY representation of an animal given human traits, it's Furry. It can be Mickey Mouse, It can be Sonic, it can be Hepcats fanart, it can be that Aflac duck . . . I don't care how sexualized or innocent, how cartoony or realistic, how crude or refined, if you are drawing animals doing things that you don't see animals doing in real life, it's Furry.

Attempting to classify yourself as Anthro when you're drawing Furry is deception at best and arrogance at worst — deception because while all furry is anthro, not all anthro is furry, and arrogance because it furthers this idea that drawing animals is okay only as long as it's within socially acceptable boundaries and you're not doing anything crazy like pretending you were a dragon or giving your catgirl the build of a college coed.

Yes, there are seedy elements of Furry, just like there are artistic nudes on DeviantArt. There is drawn pornography (commonly termed 'Yiff') in Furry, just like there's Hentai in Anime. There are plenty of Furry archives that will push these limits, just like there's other art archives out there that will post all the other stuff DeviantArt doesn't allow. There is no excuse for claiming all Furry is Yiff, just like there is no excuse for claiming all Anime is Hentai. (For those who have short memories, the Anime/Manga/Hentai connection was a common mistake in the 90's, but this too has died down thanks to the mainstreaming of Anime and Manga.)

Unless your animal characters are little plush toys, art sculptures, or some other series of inanimate objects that have somehow come to life, you are dealing in Furry  — and if said items have any human traits whatsoever, they're still Furry. The sooner we all accept this fact and stop treating the term 'Furry' like it only applies to the kinky fetish side of Anthro . . .

. . . the sooner we can get the rest of the internet to cut us some slack.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconisellahowler:
IsellaHowler Featured By Owner Oct 27, 2014  Hobbyist Artisan Crafter
I agree. Wow, I was always wondering this. Thank you.
Reply
:iconakotori:
akotori Featured By Owner Oct 21, 2014  New member
Thanks so much it was really helpful. I just have one question.... an animal withouth human shape, just animal appearance, but It's playing the guitar, it would be furry too??
Vinyl Scratch The DJ PON-3 Bunny Emoji-25 (Listening to music) [V2] 
Reply
:iconnotsoregularfox:
NotsoregularFox Featured By Owner Edited Oct 3, 2014   Digital Artist
for anyone confused: it's like comparing Mcdonalds with the food industry. mcdonalds makes a type of food, which is unfortunetely sometimes nasty. the food industry makes all food. mcdonalds is an analogy for furries here. the food industry is anthro itself.

i shoul mention that the analogy here was based on the assumption that there is at least 1 mcdonalds meal that the reader of this comment actually enjoys.
Reply
:icontexas-doughnut:
Texas-Doughnut Featured By Owner Edited Oct 2, 2014  Student Digital Artist
"If you are drawing ANY representation of an animal given human traits, it's Furry."

does it mean that ancient Egyptians were furries too?
Reply
:iconnotsoregularfox:
NotsoregularFox Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2014   Digital Artist
although the idea seems very odd; technically, yes.
Reply
:icontexas-doughnut:
Texas-Doughnut Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2014  Student Digital Artist
well, they were pretty powerfull.
so i dont feel sorry for making my stuff anymore.
Reply
:iconnotsoregularfox:
NotsoregularFox Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2014   Digital Artist
...although, here's the problem: you not a furry, you're a brony. That didnt start up until mlp, and thats with the generous assumption that it started with the original, not the modern one. Ponies, while technically anthropomorhic animals, do no apply to the ancient egyptian history, which depicts birds and wolf like creatures mostly. So, unless you also make artwork of something not mlp specific you cant really say that your art in any way connects with he ancient egyptians' anthropomorphic depictions of their gods.

simply put, anthropomorphic artwork stretches much farther back in history than mlp ponies do. MUCH furthur.
but that only adds another level to the heirarchy, doesnt really mean much else:

ANTHRO (main genre)
     [Furry (sub genre)
          [ponies (sub genre of the sub genre)
Reply
:icondr-gunhammer:
Dr-GUNHaMMER Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2014  Professional Interface Designer
a furfag is a furfag
Reply
:iconnotsoregularfox:
NotsoregularFox Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2014   Digital Artist
although i personally would use the kinder term "very confused furry", i agree. not all furries are the bad ones.
Reply
:icondr-gunhammer:
Dr-GUNHaMMER Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2014  Professional Interface Designer
furries are gay = furfags
Reply
Add a Comment: